A day in which it is asserted that the sun will come out. Ascribing to tomorrow the qualities of a sentient being, it could be said: “You’re only a day away.”
Oh yeah. The demons are back. Anxiety with just a nice hint of depression coming around the corner. It’s bad this time, bad in a big way, probably the worst since the first time it all went to shit, which has been 12-13 years behind me now. I had just gotten us up out of our mess at the crumby apartment, gotten myself back in school, and gotten a home loan. Think there might be a connection there? Feelings of disability in coping with my responsibilities? I feel like that’s a part of it, but just a part.
The feeling is just one of constant discomfiture: I imagine it’s something like an addict feels when he hasn’t had a fix. A nervous, skin-crawling on-edge sense of preoccupation with a thing which seems initially to have revolved around driving at night, or going to large public places, but which has just now taken over large parts of my life. At work, and even at home, this feeling is taking up a majority of my waking life. For how long? I don’t know, I hope it is short and ugly, like it has been times before, but to be honest, I fear I won’t be that lucky.
I don’t normally like to talk about these episodes, and so I doubt I will much change that habit, but be aware that if I do not write much in the next little while, the reason is that I am trying to get myself well again, and that I hope it will be very soon.
A post to cover the month of September, because I’ll feel like a chump if I don’t.
Published September 24, 2010 school 1 CommentGotta get in at least one post a month. It’s funny how I weave in and out of blog productivity. Almost like I have a life or something. Almost.
I’ve been mired in Fall semester classes for several weeks now at ASU, here in awe-inspiring, historic Augusta, GA. Man alive, it’s only two classes but it’s going to be harder than I thought to get all A’s this time around. I’ve got two professors (make that one professor, and one BROfessor), both of them are relatively new adjuncts here, and both seemingly have the agenda of proving themselves to be hardasses in order to get better positions athe University. Well, I can sympathize with their plight a little bit: I know academic life is a tough slog and is why even though I think I would be well-suited for academia, I’ll probably avoid the temptation just to keep things profitable in other areas of my life. But I thought I could just BS my way through these classes and get As. I think Bs are definitely doable with a minimum of effort, but in the paper I got back from my english class yesterday, dude actually called me out for having “an eloquent pen but not much to say here”. He’s totally right, too! I don’t have much to say because the part of the text I picked to expound upon was a crappy choice, and I can see that I’m going to have to choose more wisely next time.
Writing is such a finicky endeavor for me, and the main reason my posts here are so short is because I can easily get to this stage of narrative where even I don’t believe the bullshit I’m going on about. And if I’m getting to that point, I figure what’s the use of trying to get anybody else on board the tripe-mobile with me when there are better things to do. Well, writing for school has proven to be no different, because I had to literally force myself to continue to write just to make the 1500-word requirement for the assignment. I’m probably the lamest English major of all time, because even though I have a passion for good books and am a pretty strong writer myself, I find it fairly difficult to wrap me brainbox around the idea of Criticism as a Serious Pursuit. Mayhap I’m not a Serious Person, and if so please forgive the impertinence, there’s a good chap; but I just think the best critics are people like Roger Ebert, who have been able to sythesize criticism and autobiography in such an awesome way that, in some of his finer examples of long form writing, Ebert is actually able to surpass the object of his criticism. People who read Ebert will know what I mean by this, he is a master of the subjective narrative and I think in a hundred years, while we may not still care about James Cameron, we will still be reading Ebert’s reactions to him.
None of this is to say, “oh, if only they’d give me free reign, I’d tear some criticism up and have it screaming my name”, because I don’t think that’s the case. I appreciate the fact that school is a structured environment where you sometimes have to do things you don’t necessarily find to be intellectually fulfilling. I get it. But passing over the noble arguments about ideal educational approaches, the hard truth is that my GPA sucks, so I have to start making some As in a hurry so I can get past the sins of my younger days, and it’s a tad discouraging to me that I’ll be upset if I end up with Bs instead.
I hope I haven’t jinxed myself by complaining. I’m going to have to take a look at this post again in December. If I end up with Cs I swear to Baby Jesus I’m going to cry bitter bitter tears. Thank God for vodka.
Madness is to think of too many things in succession too fast, or of one thing too exclusively.
Published August 3, 2010 Creepy Guy Leave a CommentIf you ever want to feel the gaping void of madness that would be created by immortality, just do what I did today:
1. Go to work while it’s raining very hard.
2. Fall into a puddle and thoroughly soak your socks.
3. Try to microwave the socks.
4. One minute later, enjoy your blackened, burned, useless socks.
4. One second later, throw them shits in the trash ’cause they stank.
4? Relent to societal and workplace demands, put your wet feet into a pair of ten-year-old leather bucks with no socks, and no hope of getting socks.
4! Work with nice older ladies who prefer the thermostat to be set at all times to 62 degrees.
∞ Watch as your nice eight-hour workday turns into Ī́̅̂͌҉̺̲͕̺̺̳̣̫ ̵̣̖̹͙́͂͐͌ͦͬ͗̓ͤ́C͉̳͙͊̇͑̄ͯ̊͟͝Ä̶̹͔͚́̇̄̅ͯ̇ͯ̃̚͘N̛̳̼͔̫̥̎͆̅̚ ͯ̑́҉̤̲̹̹̕͟S̷̺̹̬̭̪̤̾̅ͦĒ͂̃ͭ̋ͫ̎҉̴͕͕̝̪͍̪̮ͅE̺̭̬͍͇̬ͭͣ̈́̏̂ ̺̳̯͔̞̳̽͊̊́͋ͫͬ́͢F̲̻͚̈̏͂̓̏ͫ͑͢Õ̴̻̘͎̪͎̹̮̳̒͌̂̕R̩̭̆̀̐̽̀̔͟E̐̆͒̉ͭ̋ͥ͐͏̵҉̠̖̪̮̬͓͇V̋҉̙̻E ̹̤͔̹͖͎̞̤͛͆R̡̗̣̥̳͇͔̓͋ͣ͝.
Cheapskater’s Review: 39dollarglasses.com
Published July 15, 2010 Econ 098 , Materials Leave a CommentMy wife and I ordered two pairs of glasses from www.39dollarglasses.com after having looked all over the internet for the best buying advice for cheap glasses. Neither one of us has a special funky prescription, so we figured what the heck, let’s save ourselves 400+ dollars and just buy glasses once a year or so (or however long it takes for them to either a.) break or b.) become thoroughly unfashionable).
The glasses that I received are pretty awesome.
I was immediately impressed with the build quality and the index of the lenses was awesome, because they are so thin compared to my old pair! The frames are not the high quality enamel of Ray Ban or Oakley, but they are good solid plastic frames, and because they are not enameled they are also extremely light, which has turned out, weeks later, to be a huge plus. I have already ordered another pair of similarly accoutered sunglasses for myself. It’s a great deal as long as you aren’t tempted by the upgrade features like photochromic lenses, super high index lenses, blinged-out cases and whatever else they hit you with at the end.
The downside to our experience has been Jeannie’s glasses. The frames are really high quality, but for whatever reason, the lenses just weren’t right. We looked over our prescription though and the problem appears to be that the official pupillary distance measurements are different from the measurements we made ourselves, so it does seem to be our fault. However, we were offered a 70% refund and we think that is fair, as getting glasses is just as much a service as it is a retail product. Anyway, we put in another prescription, this time with the proper PD measurement and we’ve got our fingers crossed that these will be as great as mine have been thus far.
My take on it is that it’s a really good deal and the only reason to say no is that you have some silly requirement to have a specific brand label on your eyewear. Because let’s face it, glasses get to looking pretty junked up in a hurry, no matter how expensive they are, and when you pay (much) less for (slightly) less quality, it’s doesn’t hurt the wallet nearly so bad when it’s time to replace the glasses you have. So far, I’m a fan of this company and this business model. It’ll be interesting to see whether this opinion is redeemed or refuted in the next few days, as we attempt to collect our refund and get our new pairs in.
*UPDATE 8/3/2010* & The whistles go WHOO WHOO!
These new sunglasses are so bad-ass that I wear them at night (so I can, so I can, watch you weave then breathe your story lines).
Seriously, I like them a lot, I have done a complete 180 in that I NOW CRAVE SUNLIGHT FOR TO TEST MY MIGHTY SUNSHIELDS. And my wife’s came in and they are also very good quality and fit great and make her to look like the sexity (I don’t remember what they are called, so photo is a no-go, bro). And yep, if you’re keeping track, we did get the refund for the bad pair after about a week. So, my money is going to these guys from now on, until they fuck up, which will be never because my readership at this blog is INTENSE and is a TERRIBL(Y INSPIRING) MOTIVATOR for any business looking to stay afloat.


